Photography is not a fixed reflection

If photography were merely a reflection, there would have been no need to invent it, and a mirror would have sufficed.

This forces one to say that photography is a fixed, preserved reflection, which contradicts both sense and reason.

It is the same as saying that realistic painting is the fixing of a reflection on paper using brush and colors. Same thing.

One is merely deceived by the precision of the machine’s drawing, nothing more, nothing less.

Wallahi the truth is clear.

Popular posts from this blog

To photograph equals to draw using light

To photograph = to draw using light. There are no shadows or reflections in this equation. The only reason someone would insert such terms is because they do not understand how a machine uses light to produce images — and that is purely scientific. No expert says that photography is like a mirror, or that a camera traps shadows. None. The only people in the world who make that claim are Muslims who say drawing by hand is forbidden, but photography is not. Isn’t that enough reason to stop and rethink one’s position on this matter — especially when grave punishment awaits image makers?
Read more

Why so dedicated to the matter of photography?

One may ask: why write such posts? Because it has become absurd that many scholars describe photography as merely "shadow capturing", or more faithfully, "shadow trapping". And now, saying that "photographing animate beings is forbidden" is treated as insanity. It is a duty to resist such false beliefs.
Read more